autorenew
Backpack Exchange Clarifies Liquidation Misunderstandings Amid Meme Token Market Crash

Backpack Exchange Clarifies Liquidation Misunderstandings Amid Meme Token Market Crash

In the fast-paced world of crypto, especially with meme tokens on Solana flying high one day and crashing the next, things can get heated quickly. Recently, a tweet storm erupted around Backpack Exchange, founded by Armani Ferrante, who's also behind the popular MadLads NFT collection and Anchor framework. It all started with a viral post criticizing how the exchange handled liquidations during a massive market dip, but Ferrante stepped in to set the record straight. Let's break it down step by step, explaining the tech jargon along the way, so you can see what really went down and what it means for your meme token trades.

The Spark: A Viral Misunderstanding

It kicked off with a post from @CryptoA77468 on X, which racked up over 850,000 views. The user painted a grim picture: imagine getting liquidated (that's when your leveraged position gets forcibly closed because the market moves against you), depositing more funds to buy the dip, only for those funds to vanish because you supposedly still owed money. They claimed this happened to Backpack users and even included a screenshot of a Discord message from Ferrante himself seeming to confirm it.

Screenshot of Armani Ferrante's Discord message explaining liquidation settlements

The screenshot shows Ferrante saying: "Yes of course. Basically if you get liquidated, you have to pay your losses to winners. If you didn't have enough dollars to pay your losses to winners, then you owe the winners money. If you deposited and the funds didn't land, it's because you paid the winners the money you owed them." At first glance, it sounds harsh—like the exchange is clawing back funds post-liquidation. But as Ferrante later explained, this was taken out of context. It was a technical explanation of how perpetual futures (perps) work, not a policy to screw over users.

Ferrante's Detailed Response

Ferrante, waking up to the viral backlash, posted a heartfelt thread on X (view the full thread here). He emphasized that the Backpack team cares deeply about users and has been working non-stop to address issues from the liquidation cascade. Key points from his response:

  • No Clawbacks or Socialized Losses: Unlike some exchanges where losses are spread across all users, Backpack didn't do that. Every trader was paid out automatically without issues.
  • Daily Proof of Reserves: They published this even on the chaotic day, showing transparency.
  • What Really Happened: Liquidity dried up during the crash, leading to mass liquidations and Auto-Deleveraging (ADL). ADL is a mechanism where profitable positions are partially closed to cover bankrupt ones, preventing wider losses.
  • Settlement Mechanics Explained: In perps, it's zero-sum—winners get paid by losers directly. The exchange is just a matchmaker, not a counterparty. If a loser goes bankrupt (runs out of margin), their account gets stuck in settlement. If they deposit more before manual intervention, those funds settle the debt automatically.
  • Backpack Stepped Up: They settled all accounts on behalf of users without touching unrealized profits. Only a handful of cases (about 40, mostly small amounts) were affected, and they're handling any complaints via [email protected] or Discord.

Ferrante stressed that Backpack's design isolates risks—no "run on the bank" scenarios. Spot holders without leverage were untouched. It's built for robustness, especially in wild markets like those for Solana meme tokens.

The Follow-Up: Keeping It Simple

Later, Ferrante summed it up succinctly in another post (see it here): "In short, users never owe more margin than they put into a position. There was no socialized loss. No clawbacks. A lot of liquidations. A lot of ADL. That's the boring truth."

He also clarified in replies that perps on Backpack are non-recourse—meaning you can't lose more than you put in—and confirmed they absorbed any bad debt themselves in rare cases.

Why This Matters for Meme Token Enthusiasts

Meme tokens, especially on Solana with projects like MadLads leading the charge, are all about high volatility and quick gains. But leverage amplifies that, and events like this highlight the risks. If you're trading perps on platforms like Backpack, understand that:

  • Leverage is Double-Edged: It can boost profits but leads to liquidations in dips.
  • Choose Transparent Exchanges: Backpack's daily reserves and neutral stance make it safer for isolated risks.
  • Stay Informed: Follow updates on Discord or X to avoid misinformation.

This incident shows how quickly narratives spread in crypto, but also how founders like Ferrante engage directly with the community. For meme token traders, it's a reminder to DYOR (do your own research) and trade responsibly.

If you're into Solana memes, check out MadLads or dive deeper into Backpack's features. Got thoughts? Share in the comments below!

You might be interested