autorenew
Abraxas Capital: The New Alameda? Pre-Collapse Transfers Exposed

Abraxas Capital: The New Alameda? Pre-Collapse Transfers Exposed

In the fast-paced world of crypto, where scandals can erupt overnight, a recent tweet from MartyParty is turning heads and raising eyebrows. He boldly claims that Abraxas Capital is the "new Alameda," drawing parallels to the infamous trading arm of FTX that played a key role in its downfall. Let's break this down step by step, explaining the key players and why this matters—especially if you're into meme tokens.

The Core Allegation

MartyParty's tweet (view it here)[10] points to transfers happening between March and May 2022. During this period, Alameda Research allegedly bridged hundreds of millions—possibly even billions—of USDT (Tether's stablecoin pegged to the US dollar) to wallets connected to Abraxas Capital. This was done via Stargate Finance, a cross-chain bridging protocol powered by LayerZero.

For those new to the terms: Stargate Finance allows seamless transfers of assets like stablecoins across different blockchains, reducing the hassle of moving funds between networks like Ethereum and Solana. LayerZero is the underlying tech that makes these instant, omnichain transfers possible. It's handy for traders but, as this allegation suggests, could also be a tool for moving large sums discreetly.

These transfers reportedly occurred right as FTX was facing solvency issues, echoing Alameda's notorious habit of mixing customer funds from FTX with its own proprietary trading activities. Alameda, founded by Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF), was essentially FTX's sister company, and its risky bets contributed heavily to the exchange's 2022 collapse, which wiped out billions in user assets.

Meme image depicting SBF's alleged return through Abraxas Capital

Community Buzz and Echoes of the Past

The crypto Twitter (now X) sphere is abuzz with similar sentiments. For instance, users like @stewxbt have posted memes suggesting SBF is "back" through Abraxas, linking it directly to Alameda and even former Alameda co-CEO Ryan Salame (sometimes referred to as "AlamedaTrabucco" in jest, nodding to another ex-exec, Trabucco).[11] Others, such as @trading_axe, call Abraxas "AKA Alameda Research" while discussing their trading positions, like holding massive ETH shorts that could influence market prices.[16]

One thread highlights Abraxas's alleged hedging strategies, with funds suspiciously tracing back to Alameda.[18] There's even speculation about market manipulation, with @Ares_0x joking that if Abraxas is Alameda reincarnated, they might pump meme tokens like $TRUMP to secure a presidential pardon for SBF.[24] It's peak crypto humor, but it underscores real concerns about hidden influences in volatile markets.

From on-chain data shared in discussions, like those from @lookonchain, whales (large holders) linked to these entities are shorting ETH on platforms like Hyperliquid, potentially exacerbating price swings.[17] And blockchain explorers confirm smaller transfers, such as $20 million USDT moved via Stargate in 2022, fueling the narrative.[25]

Ties to Real-World Crypto Drama

Abraxas Capital Management, a London-based firm, has popped up in official FTX bankruptcy documents as a creditor or counterparty.[6] Web reports note their ongoing activities, like shorting hundreds of millions in crypto even post-FTX.[5] Industry voices, including from Brevan Howard's CIO at Abraxas, emphasize the need for better risk management in crypto, ironically referencing the FTX fallout.[3]

While these connections are circumstantial, they align with patterns seen in the Tether papers, where Alameda was a major player in USDT flows.[1] No official denials from Abraxas have surfaced in recent searches, leaving room for speculation.

What This Means for Meme Tokens

At Meme Insider, we're all about meme tokens—the fun, volatile side of blockchain where community hype can turn pennies into fortunes. But scandals like this remind us of the risks. If entities like Abraxas (with alleged Alameda ties) are moving billions under the radar, it could lead to market manipulations that hit meme coins hard. Think sudden pumps or dumps on Solana-based memes or ETH tokens, where cross-chain bridges like Stargate play a big role.

For blockchain practitioners, this is a call to dive deeper into on-chain analysis tools. Track wallets, monitor bridges, and stay skeptical of big moves. It's not just drama; it's a lesson in how interconnected the crypto ecosystem is.

As the story develops, we'll keep an eye on Abraxas and any new revelations. In crypto, today's tweet could be tomorrow's headline. What do you think—is Abraxas really Alameda 2.0? Drop your thoughts in the comments!

You might be interested