autorenew

Are Large Crypto Pools Destroying the Industry for Short-Term Profit?

Hey there, meme token enthusiasts and blockchain buffs! If you’ve been keeping an eye on the crypto world, you might have noticed some heated discussions popping up on X lately. One post that’s got people talking comes from Noah (@TraderNoah), who dropped a bombshell on July 28, 2025, about how some of the biggest players in the crypto space might be hurting the industry for a quick buck. Let’s dive into this juicy topic and break it down in a way that’s easy to digest—even if you’re new to the blockchain game.

The Big Claim: Short-Term Profit Over Industry Health

Noah’s post hits hard with a bold statement: some of the largest pools of capital in crypto are “actively destroying this industry for short-term profit.” Ouch! He points out that many of these players got burned during the 2022 crypto crash but seem to have learned nothing. Instead of acting as responsible stewards, they’re back with even less regard for the long-term health of the market. This is a big deal because these pools—think venture capital (VC) funds and liquid funds—often have the power to shape where the industry goes.

For those unfamiliar, VCs are investors who put money into early-stage crypto projects, while liquid funds manage assets that can be traded more easily. When these big players prioritize quick profits over sustainable growth, it can lead to risky moves that destabilize the market. Noah’s not alone in this thinking—other X users, like Arthur (@Arthur_0x), have been echoing similar concerns about poor capital allocation in the industry.

What’s Going Wrong?

So, what’s the root of the problem? Noah suggests that these large pools are ignoring the lessons of the past. The 2022 crash was a wake-up call for many, showing how speculative investments and lack of oversight could tank the market. Yet, it seems some are doubling down on the same old tactics. This could mean overvaluing projects, dumping tokens on retail investors (like the mention of Polychain dumping TIA), or not protecting tokenholders—those who actually own the crypto tokens and rely on their value.

Tokenholders are the backbone of many crypto projects, especially in the meme token space we cover at Meme Insider. When big players act irresponsibly, it’s often the little guy who gets hurt. For example, if a VC pumps money into a project and then sells off its tokens for a profit, the price can crash, leaving regular investors holding the bag. This lack of transparency and accountability is a recurring theme in the thread, with users like Felipe Montealegre (@TheiaResearch) suggesting solutions like the MetaDAO framework to give tokenholders more control.

Proposed Solutions: Call Them Out and Cut the Cash Flow

Noah doesn’t just complain—he offers two simple yet bold solutions:

  1. Call them out: Name and shame the bad actors to create public pressure.
  2. Discourage LPs from committing capital: Limited Partners (LPs) are the folks who fund these VC and liquid funds. If they pull back, it could force change.

This idea of peer pressure and voting with your wallet resonates with the community. In the thread, Crypto Lee (@OlaLee2022) and others are already asking, “Who are they?”—pushing for transparency. It’s like a digital uprising, with users rallying behind the “Tokenholders Unite” vibe seen in related posts. The challenge? As Hammer 🔨🐸 (@hammerfrog64) points out, greed often gets rewarded in bull markets, making it hard to break the cycle.

Why This Matters for Meme Tokens

At Meme Insider, we’re all about meme tokens—those fun, community-driven cryptos like Dogecoin or Shiba Inu. These projects often rely on hype and retail investment, making them especially vulnerable to the actions of large capital pools. If VCs and funds keep prioritizing short-term dumps over building real value, it could kill the spirit of meme tokens, which thrive on community trust and engagement. Imagine a world where every pump-and-dump leaves meme token holders skeptical—not a great look for the future!

What Can We Do?

As blockchain practitioners, we can take action. Start by staying informed—follow threads like this one on X and dig into the latest crypto news. Support projects with clear token rights and push for frameworks like MetaDAO or Futarchy, which give tokenholders a say. And if you’re an LP or investor, consider where your money’s going—support funds that prioritize long-term health over quick wins.

This conversation is just heating up, and with the crypto market evolving fast, your voice matters. What do you think—should we name names, or is there a better way to hold these big players accountable? Drop your thoughts in the comments, and let’s keep the discussion going!


You might be interested