Quick Summary

• Multiple tokens labeled “Binance Community/币安社区” exist on BNB Chain with different contract addresses—a classic red flag.
• The address covered here is: 0xf10718137e2a3ea7ec94e48fd831960857861036 (BEP-20 on BNB Chain).
• Data across trackers is inconsistent (supply, market cap, volume, price), which complicates valuation and risk assessment.
• The name leans on the “Binance” brand but is not officially affiliated with Binance.
• Proceed with extreme caution: verify the exact contract on BscScan and watch out for honeypots, high taxes, and low liquidity traps.

What is the “币安社区 / Binance Community” token?

“币安社区” translates to “Binance Community.” It’s a widely recognized brand phrase for Binance’s user ecosystem—but here it’s being used as a token name by independent deployers on BNB Chain. That brand familiarity can draw attention, but it can also mislead users into assuming official ties that don’t exist.

The specific token analyzed in this article:

• Network: BNB Chain (BEP-20)
• Contract: 0xf10718137e2a3ea7ec94e48fd831960857861036

Important: There are several different tokens using the “Binance Community/币安社区” name across BNB Chain with different addresses. This presents a major risk factor.

Why multiple tokens are a serious red flag

• Name collisions: Multiple contracts sharing the same name/symbol make it easy to confuse buyers, spoof listings, and reroute liquidity—tactics commonly seen in phishing or rug-pull attempts.
• Contradictory data: Trackers show conflicting total supplies, circulating supplies, caps, volumes, and even prices (including tokens dropping close to or at -100% in 24 hours). This is often a symptom of fragmented liquidity across copycat contracts and low-quality deployments.
• Scam narratives: Community posts frequently warn about “Binance Community” scams—e.g., fake chat groups pushing “DeFi mining” with promises of 1%–8% daily returns, which is a classic hallmark of fraud.

Bottom line: identical names across many contracts make it hard to know what you’re buying, and they increase the chance of interacting with a malicious or abandoned contract.

Not affiliated with Binance

Despite the name, this token is not an official Binance product. Binance’s “community” refers to users and social channels, not a token. For Binance-sanctioned announcements, rely on Binance.com and verified social accounts only.

Conflicting tokenomics and market data

Because multiple contracts exist:

• Total supply varies across listings (e.g., 1,000,000,000 vs. 1,000,000,001).
• Circulating supply can range from zero to hundreds of millions—depending on which contract you’re looking at.
• Market caps swing from a few thousand dollars to several million, with inconsistent, sometimes negligible trading volume.
• Some trackers have flagged certain “币安社区” entries for deletion due to low activity.

When you see this level of inconsistency, treat it as a strong signal to slow down and deep-dive verification before any transaction.

Where people trade and what to watch for

Reported venues include:

• Decentralized exchanges such as PancakeSwap v2.
• Wallet-integrated swaps like OKX Wallet and Bitget Wallet.
• Analytics and trading dashboards such as GMGN.AI (币安社区 page), which offers real-time token data, smart-money tracking, risk checks (e.g., honeypot/taxes), and automated trading via Telegram.

If you trade:

• Double-check the exact contract address before swapping.
• Inspect liquidity pools and recent transactions.
• Test with a small amount first to detect potential honeypots or extreme slippage/taxes.

How to verify the exact token you’re interacting with

1. Confirm the address on BscScan: 0xf10718137e2a3ea7ec94e48fd831960857861036. Verify decimals, holders, and contract source (if verified).
2. Check liquidity: On DEXs like PancakeSwap v2, examine the liquidity pool size, pair age, and LP token locks.
3. Scan for red flags:
   • Trading restrictions: Are sells blocked or throttled? That’s a honeypot sign.
   • Excessive taxes: 10%–20%+ buy/sell taxes can cripple exit liquidity.
   • Admin powers: Minting, blacklist/whitelist, fee changes, and trading toggles can be abused.
4. Cross-reference data: Use multiple aggregators and dashboards (including the token’s page on GMGN.AI) to verify consistency across price, volume, and holders.
5. Validate social and docs: Look for original whitepaper, dev/team transparency, and verifiable community channels. Be wary of inflated follower counts with little organic engagement.

Common scam patterns to avoid

• Guaranteed daily returns (1%–8%): This is a staple of Ponzi-like schemes.
• Fake “community” groups: Cold-invites on WhatsApp/Telegram/Skype pushing “mining pools” or time-limited deposits are almost certainly fraudulent.
• Urgent calls to bridge/fund external wallets: Legit projects don’t pressure you into private deals or off-platform transfers.
• Copycat branding: Using “Binance” (or similar) to imply endorsement is a deception vector.

Risk checklist for meme tokens like 币安社区

• Multiple contracts using the same name or ticker
• Low or unlocked liquidity; no LP locks
• Unverified contract source; admin keys with broad powers
• Thin or inauthentic community presence
• Volatile price with sporadic, bot-like volume spikes
• Inconsistent data across explorers and trackers

If two or more are true, assume high risk.

For practitioners: research workflow

• Start with the contract on BscScan: verify code, events, holders, and token transfers.
• Review live trading on PancakeSwap v2 with tiny test buys; watch slippage and execution.
• Leverage dashboards for deeper context, including GMGN.AI’s token page for smart money flows, risk checks, and real-time analytics.
• Validate the narrative: Does the project have meaningful utility, or is it purely meme-driven? High reliance on hype equals higher exit/liquidity risks.
• Monitor for audits and third-party code reviews. Absence of audits increases the burden on your own analysis.

Final take

“币安社区 / Binance Community” on BNB Chain is a high-risk landscape due to the proliferation of similarly named tokens, conflicting market data, and recurring scam patterns. If you choose to engage with the contract at 0xf10718137e2a3ea7ec94e48fd831960857861036, do so with extreme caution, test minimal amounts first, and prioritize independent verification through explorers and reputable dashboards. Protect your capital: no hype, name, or promise of quick returns is worth skipping due diligence.