Snapshot

• Token symbol: CENT
• Contract address (Base): 0xe8a29c6f156f9d009576c2d39a732d676685077d
• Status: Low-profile/underdocumented; no clear official site, whitepaper, or verified team attributable to this exact Base address
• What this means: Treat as high risk until verifiable details emerge

Why this CENT is hard to pin down

CENT is a common ticker across crypto. Our review found no widely recognized, well-documented project tied directly to the Base contract 0xe8a29c6f156f9d009576c2d39a732d676685077d. That doesn’t inherently mean it’s malicious—it could be new or niche—but it does mean you should proceed carefully and verify everything by the contract address, not the name.

Quick context: Base in one minute

• Base is an Ethereum Layer-2 built on the Optimism OP Stack, aiming for lower fees and faster transactions while inheriting Ethereum security (Base).
• Gas token: ETH (Base has no native token).
• Ecosystem: Rapidly growing, spanning DeFi, NFTs, social apps, and infra.

Don’t confuse this CENT with others

These are separate projects using similar tickers; they are not linked to the Base contract above unless proven otherwise:

• CENTER COIN (CENT) on Ethereum/KAIA (CoinMarketCap)
• Centience (CENTS), an AI/memetics project (CoinGecko)
• Making Cents (CENT) on Vite/BSC (CoinMooner)
• CentToken tied to a DEX/wallet concept on Ethereum (GitHub)

Always default to contract-address verification on BaseScan.

What we can (and cannot) confirm so far

• Standard: Likely ERC-20 (as Base is EVM-compatible), but decimals, supply, and functions are not confirmed publicly.
• Docs: No official website, whitepaper, or audit tied to this Base address was found.
• Listings: No clear presence on major aggregators or widely used exchange listings for this specific Base token.

Given the information gap, any assumptions about utility (DeFi, NFTs, governance, rewards, etc.) are speculative until the project publishes verifiable documentation.

How to verify the right token yourself

1. Start with the contract
   • Use BaseScan to review:
     • Contract verification status and source code
     • Holder distribution and transfer history
     • Any linked social profiles or name tags
2. Look for official channels
   • Check the project’s X, Telegram, Discord, and website—only if they explicitly reference this exact Base address.
3. Seek audits and tokenomics
   • Look for third-party audits and a clear breakdown of supply, mint/burn permissions, taxes, and vesting.
4. Check liquidity intelligently
   • If liquidity exists on a DEX, inspect the pool contract, token pair, lock status, and history of adds/removes.

Wallet setup and safe interaction

• Add Base network to your EVM wallet (e.g., Coinbase Wallet or MetaMask):
  • Network: Base Mainnet
  • RPC: https://mainnet.base.org
  • Chain ID: 8453
  • Currency: ETH
  • Explorer: https://basescan.org
• Import token by contract address: 0xe8a29c6f156f9d009576c2d39a732d676685077d
• Fund gas: Bridge a small amount of ETH for gas via reputable bridges or centralized exchanges that support Base.

Security tips:

• Start with tiny test transactions.
• Beware of tokens with mutable tax settings or upgradeable proxies controlled by unknown admins.
• Avoid connecting wallets to untrusted dApps.

Trading and discovery

There are no widely confirmed, major exchange listings for this specific CENT on Base as of now. If you explore liquidity or market activity:

• Use Base-native DEX dashboards and explorers like BaseScan to locate pools and verify pairs.
• Check established Base DEXs such as Aerodrome Finance and multi-chain interfaces like Uniswap.
• You can also research and monitor this token via gmgn.ai, which offers real-time on-chain analytics for Base tokens.

Important: Always confirm you are interacting with the exact contract address above and not a similarly named ERC-20.

Key risks to weigh

• Transparency gap: No verifiable team, docs, or audits tied to this contract.
• Liquidity risk: Thin or removable liquidity can cause extreme slippage or trapped funds.
• Contract risk: Unverified or unaudited code may contain minting backdoors, high taxes, or honeypot logic.
• Brand confusion: “CENT” is a common ticker, making impersonation or mistaken identity more likely.
• Market risk: New or obscure tokens can be highly volatile and illiquid.

A practical due-diligence checklist

• Verify the contract on BaseScan.
• Find official channels that explicitly reference this exact Base address.
• Inspect contract privileges (owner, pausable, upgradeable, mint/burn).
• Read any published audits; if none, proceed with extreme caution.
• Review holder distribution and liquidity lock status.
• Test small before any meaningful interaction.

Useful links

• BaseScan (contract): https://basescan.org/token/0xe8a29c6f156f9d009576c2d39a732d676685077d
• Base network docs: https://docs.base.org/
• Aerodrome Finance: https://aerodrome.finance/
• Uniswap: https://uniswap.org/
• GMGN token page (Base CENT): https://gmgn.ai/base/token/fV1R5sZ5_0xe8a29c6f156f9d009576c2d39a732d676685077d

Bottom line

This CENT on Base is best approached with a contract-first mindset. Until there’s a verifiable website, team, tokenomics, and audit tied to 0xe8a29c6f156f9d009576c2d39a732d676685077d, treat it as high risk. If you experiment, keep sizes small, double-check every link, and rely on explorers and reputable dashboards to validate what you’re seeing on-chain.