If you’re researching COCO on BNB Chain, you’ve likely noticed multiple tokens sharing the same ticker. This guide focuses on the COCO token at contract address 0x8607d0dcdd938c9978debfa2c03b807dc3e782bf and helps you avoid confusing it with the widely recognized COCOCOIN that uses a different contract. We’ll cover what’s known, how to verify details, and how to approach trading and security checks.

TL;DR for 0x8607… COCO

• Network: BNB Chain (BEP-20)
• Contract: 0x8607d0dcdd938c9978debfa2c03b807dc3e782bf
• Public data: Limited. Not prominently listed on major trackers like CoinGecko or CoinMarketCap under this address, and price/volume may be unavailable.
• Takeaway: Treat as a lesser-documented or niche token. Verify everything on-chain before interacting.

Why the confusion? Meet COCOCOIN (a different project)

A separate, more established project on BNB Chain uses the COCO ticker: COCOCOIN (also called COCO COIN) at address 0xf563e86e461de100cfcfd8b65daa542d3d4b0550. Key highlights that belong to COCOCOIN, not the 0x8607… token:

• SocialFi meme token on BNB Chain, launched in 2024 with a community-first approach and “Viral Frog” branding.
• Supply: 34.2 billion COCO.
• Security and liquidity steps: initial LP added in August 2024 and liquidity privileges burned shortly after; public CertiK audit.
• Ecosystem recognition: Winner of BNB Chain’s “Meme Heroes” LP support program (October 8, 2024), receiving $50,000 in LP support.
• Adoption: Over 170,000 holders and active trading, with historical daily volumes in the low millions and an ATH around $0.00268607.
• Trading: Commonly traded on PancakeSwap (v2).

If your intent was to research COCOCOIN, double-check the contract address you’re using: 0xf563e86e461de100cfcfd8b65daa542d3d4b0550. The rest of this article, however, focuses on 0x8607… COCO.

What we know about COCO at 0x8607…

Publicly available details for the 0x8607… contract are sparse:

• Listings: Not clearly visible on major market trackers.
• Price, volume, and market cap: Not reliably available.
• Website/socials: Not confirmed in commonly indexed sources.

What this means in practice:

• It may be a small, new, inactive, or niche token.
• It may not have established liquidity or verified markets.
• The lack of documentation increases risk; rely on on-chain facts.

How to verify the contract (hands-on checklist)

Use BscScan and your usual security tools to validate before you trade or interact.

• Contract verification

  • Is the source code verified on BscScan?
  • Are there any proxy contracts or upgradeability patterns?

• Ownership and permissions

  • Is the contract ownership renounced?
  • Any privileged roles (owner, admin, fee setter) still active?
  • Are trading taxes or transfer limits coded in?

• Holders and distribution

  • How concentrated are top wallets?
  • Any suspicious patterns (e.g., many tokens in newly created wallets)?

• Liquidity

  • Is there a liquidity pool on a DEX such as PancakeSwap?
  • Is LP locked or burned? If locked, for how long and via which locker?

• External links and socials

  • Is there an official site, GitHub, or whitepaper?
  • Do social accounts exist and show real engagement?

Tip: Start with a tiny test transaction if you decide to interact. Confirm buy/sell is possible and check for high tax or honeypot behavior with your preferred scanners.

Potential utilities (inferred, not confirmed)

Because documentation for 0x8607… is limited, any utility claims are speculative. Tokens with the COCO ticker on BNB Chain have historically targeted:

• DeFi activities like swaps, staking, or yield farming.
• NFT-related use cases (e.g., serving as a mint currency in certain tools).
• Community-driven meme coin mechanics.

Until the project publishes a clear spec, treat any “utility” as unverified and proceed carefully.

Market and liquidity reality check

• Absence from major trackers and a lack of on-chain liquidity signals often mean low activity or early-stage development.
• Without confirmed trading pairs, slippage, execution failures, or inability to sell are real risks.
• Never rely on a token’s ticker alone; multiple unrelated tokens can share “COCO.”

Where to monitor or trade

If you decide to explore, prioritize safety and real-time data:

• GMGN.AI: Monitor the token’s page, on-chain flows, and risk signals at https://gmgn.ai/bsc/token/fV1R5sZ5_0x8607d0dcdd938c9978debfa2c03b807dc3e782bf
• PancakeSwap (v2): If liquidity exists for this exact contract, you can import the address to view or trade pairs on PancakeSwap. Always verify the contract and check slippage and taxes before executing.

Note: If you intended to trade the recognized COCOCOIN instead, confirm you are using 0xf563e86e461de100cfcfd8b65daa542d3d4b0550 and not the 0x8607… token.

Security best practices for meme tokens

• Verify the exact contract on-chain, not just by name or ticker.
• Check for audits or code verification; absence isn’t conclusive but increases risk.
• Review LP status (locked/burned) and token permissions.
• Watch for extreme taxes, blacklists, or trading restrictions in code.
• Start small, and test both buy and sell.
• Prefer well-known DEXs and robust analytics tools for monitoring.

Bottom line

The COCO token at 0x8607… is poorly documented in public trackers today, which means higher uncertainty and risk. By contrast, COCOCOIN at 0xf563… is a separate, established project with a known supply, audit, and ecosystem recognition. If you engage with 0x8607… COCO, rely on BscScan verification, confirm liquidity and permissions, and use real-time monitoring tools before committing capital.

Nothing in this article is financial advice. Crypto assets are volatile and carry risk; always do your own research.