If you're diving into the world of stablecoins on Hyperliquid—a high-speed perpetuals DEX that's gaining traction in the crypto space—you've probably heard about USDH. It's the platform's native stablecoin, designed to bring stability and liquidity to trades. Recently, @francescoweb3 dropped a insightful thread on X breaking down proposals from three major players vying to issue USDH: Paxos Labs, Frax, and Native Markets. This comparison, courtesy of Castle Labs, highlights everything from backing and compliance to unique differentiators. Let's unpack it in plain English, so you can see what each brings to the table.

What is USDH and Why the Proposals Matter

USDH stands for US Dollar Hyperliquid, a stablecoin pegged to the USD and tailored for the Hyperliquid ecosystem. Hyperliquid itself is a layer-1 blockchain focused on decentralized perpetual futures trading, where speed and low fees are king. With stablecoins being the backbone of DeFi (decentralized finance), choosing the right issuer for USDH could impact everything from user trust to platform growth. These proposals outline how each issuer plans to handle issuance, reserves, revenue sharing, and more—essentially, they're pitching why they're the best fit.

The thread features a handy table summarizing the key aspects. Here's a recreated version for easy reference:

Issuer	Backing & Compliance	Value Capture	Liquidity & Market Structure	Governance & Risk	Extras / Differentiators
Paxos Labs	NY Trust Charter, licensed globally, GENIUS- and MICA-compliant, backed by Treasuries, repos, cash, USDG	95% reserve yield to Hyperliquid, capped 5% fee post-$5B TVL	Convertible from USDC, PYUSD, USDG; on/off-ramp via SWIFT, ACH, wire; incentives to bootstrap liquidity	Milestone-dependent revenue distribution; reliance on regulatory approvals (e.g., PayPal/Venmo)	PayPal integration, $20M incentives, HYPE listing, proven track record (BUSD, PYUSD), Hyperliquid alignment via Molecular Labs
Frax	Issued with US bank, tokenized Treasuries via BlackRock, Superstate, WisdomTree, cash	100% Treasury yield to Hyperliquid, programmatic and transparent allocation	FraxNet multichain, streaming reserve yield, mint/redeem across frxUSD, USDC, USDT, fiat	Dependency on US bank, complex ecosystem as strength/risk	DeFi credibility, active in US policy, innovative track record (FRAX, frxETH), Fraxlend
Native Markets	Issued on HyperEVM/HyperCore, reserves with BlackRock, Fidelity, BNY, Superstate; FinCEN-registered MSB, VASP, CASP/EMI	50% to Assistance Fund (HYPE buybacks), 50% to growth (builders, HIP-3 deployers, HyperEVM apps)	Tested ERC-20/HIP-1 tokens, CoreRouter for mint/bridge, fiat/stablecoin support, Privy wallets, Stripe ramps	Issuer-agnostic avoids single regulator, but multi-jurisdiction complexity	Hyperliquid-first, builder-led team, audited CoreRouter, strong commitment

This table captures the essence of each proposal, but let's dive deeper into what makes them stand out.

Paxos Labs: Regulatory Powerhouse with Proven Track Record

Paxos is no stranger to stablecoins—they're behind big names like BUSD (Binance USD) and PYUSD (PayPal USD). Their proposal emphasizes top-tier compliance, holding a New York Trust Charter and licenses that make them GENIUS- and MiCA-compliant (MiCA is the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation, ensuring strict standards). Backed by safe assets like US Treasuries and cash, it's all about security and trust.

What catches the eye is their value capture: 95% of reserve yields go back to Hyperliquid, with a small fee cap after hitting $5 billion in TVL (total value locked, basically the amount of assets in the system). Liquidity-wise, they offer seamless conversions from popular stablecoins and direct fiat ramps via PayPal and Venmo. Plus, they're throwing in $20 million in incentives and aligning with Hyperliquid through Molecular Labs. If you're prioritizing regulatory safety and big-name integrations, Paxos feels like a solid, enterprise-grade choice.

Frax: DeFi Innovators with Full Yield Sharing

Frax has built a reputation in DeFi with projects like FRAX (a fractional-algorithmic stablecoin) and frxETH (a liquid staking token for Ethereum). Their USDH pitch is backed by tokenized Treasuries from heavyweights like BlackRock and WisdomTree, plus a US bank partnership for issuance. It's 100% yield passthrough to Hyperliquid, meaning all Treasury earnings flow back programmatically—transparent and automated.

On liquidity, FraxNet stands out as a multichain setup for minting and redeeming across various stablecoins and even fiat. Their ecosystem is complex, which they spin as a strength for risk diversification, but it relies heavily on that US bank tie-in. Frax's extras include strong DeFi creds, policy involvement, and tools like Fraxlend for lending. If you're a DeFi native looking for innovation and max yields, this could be your pick.

Native Markets: Hyperliquid-Native with Builder Focus

Native Markets is more tailored to Hyperliquid's vibe, issuing directly on HyperEVM and HyperCore (Hyperliquid's execution layers). Reserves are held with blue-chip firms like BlackRock and Fidelity, and they're registered as an MSB (Money Services Business) with FinCEN, plus VASP and CASP/EMI statuses for global compliance.

Value capture splits 50/50: half to an Assistance Fund for HYPE token buybacks (HYPE is Hyperliquid's native token, often tied to memes and community vibes), and half to ecosystem growth like builders and app deployers. Liquidity comes via tested tokens, a CoreRouter for bridging, and user-friendly ramps with Privy wallets and Stripe. Governance avoids single-regulator risks but adds multi-jurisdiction complexity. Their differentiators scream "built for Hyperliquid"—a dedicated team, audited tech, and a commitment to the platform's growth. For those in the meme token and builder community, this feels grassroots and aligned with Hyperliquid's fast-paced, community-driven ethos.

Key Takeaways and What It Means for Meme Tokens

While USDH isn't a meme token itself, a strong stablecoin foundation on Hyperliquid could supercharge meme trading by providing stable liquidity for perps and spots. Imagine easier onboarding for viral tokens with fiat ramps and yield incentives. Paxos offers regulatory peace of mind, Frax brings DeFi smarts, and Native Markets keeps it local and builder-friendly.

The community is buzzing—check out the original thread on X for more details and discussions. Which proposal do you think wins? As Hyperliquid evolves

🔍 1 results found

[🔗 "francesco (war mode) 🏰 on X: "On @HyperliquidX and $USDH - Deep dive into @paxoslabs, @Frax and @nativemarkets proposals

1⃣ @Paxoslabs

Backing:
Licensed in US, EU, APAC, MENA. USDH would be GENIUS- and MiCA-compliant, backed by US Treasuries, repos, cash, and Paxos’s own $USDG stablecoin.

Value Capture: https://t.co/qf1FB6QTW8" / X" x.com](https://x.com/francescoweb3/status/1966066106218520984)

🔍 Found 1 search result

🔗 **​[francesco (war mode) 🏰 on X: "On @HyperliquidX and $USDH - Deep dive into @paxoslabs, @Frax and @nativemarkets proposals

1⃣ @Paxoslabs

Backing:
Licensed in US, EU, APAC, MENA. USDH would be GENIUS- and MiCA-compliant, backed by US Treasuries, repos, cash, and Paxos’s own $USDG stablecoin.

Value Capture: https://t.co/qf1FB6QTW8" / X](https://x.com/francescoweb3/status/1966066106218520984)​**
📄 # Conversation

On and $USDH - Deep dive into , and proposals

1⃣

Backing: Licensed in US, EU, APAC, MENA. US...
🌐 x.com

, these decisions could shape the next wave of blockchain innovation. Stay tuned to Meme Insider for more updates on how this ties into the wild world of meme tokens and DeFi.

🔧 Using tool: x_keyword_search
📝 Parameters: query: from:francescoweb3 USDH, limit: 20, mode: Latest

- The article must use conversational English and follow SEO best practices.

🔧 Using tool: x_keyword_search
📝 Parameters: query: from:francescoweb3 USDH, limit: 20, mode: Latest

- There's an image in the post, a comparison table of USDH proposals from Paxos Labs, Frax, and Native Markets.

---

slug: "deep-dive-usdh-proposals-on-hyperliquid-paxos-frax-native-markets"

title: "Deep Dive into USDH Stablecoin Proposals on Hyperliquid: Paxos Labs, Frax Finance, and Native Markets Compared"

description: "Explore the competing proposals for launching USDH on HyperliquidX from Paxos Labs, Frax Finance, and Native Markets. We break down backing, value capture, liquidity, governance risks, and unique differentiators to help you understand this pivotal moment in DeFi stablecoin innovation."

cover: "https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G0jaDi_WsAAtbjO.jpg"

tags: "USDH, Hyperliquid, Paxos Labs, Frax Finance, Native Markets, Stablecoins, DeFi, Blockchain, Crypto Proposals"

---

Hey folks, if you're deep into the world of decentralized finance (DeFi) and stablecoins, you've probably heard the buzz around Hyperliquid and their upcoming USDH stablecoin. USDH is set to be a dollar-pegged asset designed specifically for the Hyperliquid ecosystem, aiming to boost liquidity and reduce reliance on external stablecoins like USDC. Recently, three major players—Paxos Labs, Frax Finance, and Native Markets—submitted proposals to issue and manage USDH. This isn't just another stablecoin launch; it's a strategic move that could reshape how value flows within Hyperliquid's high-performance blockchain.

In this article, we'll dive into each proposal based on a detailed thread from crypto analyst Francesco, breaking down key aspects like backing and compliance, value capture for the ecosystem, liquidity and market structure, governance and risks, plus those standout differentiators. Whether you're a trader, builder, or just curious about the next big thing in crypto, this comparison will help you see what's at stake. Let's get into it.

Paxos Labs Proposal: The Regulated Powerhouse

Paxos Labs is no stranger to stablecoins—they've scaled giants like BUSD to over $25 billion and PYUSD to $1 billion. Their pitch for USDH emphasizes global regulatory compliance and seamless integration with traditional finance.

Backing and Compliance: Paxos plans to back USDH with a mix of US Treasuries, repos (short-term loans backed by collateral), cash, and their own USDG stablecoin. They're licensed across the US, EU, APAC, and MENA regions, ensuring GENIUS (a compliance framework) and MiCA (EU's crypto regulation) standards. This means USDH would be a fully compliant, battle-tested asset from day one.

Value Capture: Here's where it gets juicy for Hyperliquid holders—95% of the reserve yield (interest from those Treasuries) flows back to the platform. There's no fee until USDH hits $1 billion in total value locked (TVL), and even then, it's capped at 5% paid in HYPE tokens once TVL surpasses $5 billion. A milestone vote will decide the exact split, and there are incentives to kickstart TVL growth.

Liquidity and Market Structure: USDH would be natively swappable with USDC, PYUSD, and USDG, plus easy on/off-ramps via SWIFT and ACH banking networks. They'll bootstrap liquidity for spot and perpetual trading, as well as HIP-3 (Hyperliquid Improvement Proposal 3, which likely involves app integrations).

Governance and Risk: Revenue sharing depends on community governance approvals, which adds a layer of democracy but also uncertainty. A big risk is reliance on external regulatory nods, like getting HYPE listed on PayPal and Venmo.

Unique Differentiators: Paxos is pulling out all the stops with $20 million in incentives for PayPal integration, including USDH in checkout systems like Braintree and Xoom. Plus, they've acquired Molecular Labs (the team behind LHYPE and WHLP tokens), committing to build enterprise tools, onboard new issuers via HIP-3, and create earn products for tokenized liquidity pools. This could lock in value within the Hyperliquid ecosystem and cut ties with USDC dominance.

If you're betting on regulatory safety and big-name partnerships, Paxos looks like a safe, scalable bet.

Frax Finance Proposal: The DeFi Veteran with Multichain Magic

Frax has been a DeFi pioneer since 2020, known for algorithmic stablecoins and now pushing for a more institutionalized approach with USDH. Their proposal leans on proven tech and policy savvy.

Backing and Compliance: Partnering with a regulated US bank for GENIUS compliance, reserves will include tokenized Treasuries from BlackRock, Superstate, and WisdomTree, plus plain cash. This hybrid setup bridges traditional assets with on-chain efficiency.

Value Capture: All 100% of Treasury yield goes to Hyperliquid—think HYPE staking rewards, buybacks, or rebates. Governance can programmatically tweak the allocation, making it flexible and transparent.

Liquidity and Market Structure: FraxNet technology makes USDH multichain right out of the gate, with real-time streaming of yields to Hyperliquid. Minting and redeeming will work across frxUSD, USDC, and USDT, ensuring seamless liquidity without silos.

Governance and Risk: Still tied to a US bank partnership, so external dependencies loom large. Frax's complex ecosystem is a double-edged sword—it's robust but could introduce operational hiccups.

Unique Differentiators: Frax boasts $1 billion TVL across assets like frxUSD, FRAX, and frxETH, with innovations in algorithmic stability. Founder Sam Kazemian has been rubbing shoulders with Washington policymakers during stablecoin bill talks, giving them a regulatory edge that few DeFi projects have.

Frax appeals if you value DeFi innovation and multichain flexibility, but watch for those partnership risks.

Native Markets Proposal: The Hyperliquid-Native Challenger

Native Markets is pitching USDH as a "Hyperliquid-first" solution, built by insiders from the ecosystem. This feels like an in-house play with a focus on builder empowerment.

Backing and Compliance: Issued directly on HyperEVM (Hyperliquid's EVM-compatible layer) and interoperable with HyperCore. Backed by cash, US Treasuries (custodied by BlackRock, Fidelity, BNY), and on-chain via Superstate's bridge (a FinCEN-registered money services business). It's regulated but avoids single-point failures.

Value Capture: Like Frax, 100% yield to Hyperliquid, with governance-controlled distribution. They propose a 50/50 split: half to an Assistance Fund for HYPE buybacks, and half to USDH growth via builder incentives, HIP-3 deployments, and HyperEVM apps.

Liquidity and Market Structure: Building on their ERC-20 and HIP-1 experience, they've created CoreRouter for atomic minting and bridging between HyperEVM and HyperCore. API-based minting/redeeming supports fiat wires, stable swaps, Privy wallets, and Stripe ramps for consumer access.

Governance and Risk: Issuer-agnostic design spreads risk across jurisdictions, but coordinating multi-reg can get messy. No single regulator dependency is a plus for resilience.

Unique Differentiators: This is USDH as the core on-ramp, not a side project. The team includes Hyperliquid builders like Max Fiege, Anish Agnihotri, and Mclader, who've already shipped CoreRouter. They're committed to launching even without approval, showing skin in the game.

Native Markets screams alignment with Hyperliquid's ethos—perfect for those rooting for ecosystem insiders.

What Will Hyperliquid Choose? Key Factors to Watch

Selecting a USDH issuer is a big deal for HyperliquidX. Do they prioritize deep regulatory pockets and PayPal ties (Paxos)? DeFi cred and policy influence (Frax)? Or pure ecosystem loyalty (Native Markets)? It boils down to alignment, revenue splits, strategic uniques, and compliance.

As stablecoins evolve, USDH could supercharge Hyperliquid's perp trading and app ecosystem, keeping value in-house. For more details, check out the full report linked in Francesco's thread. What do you think— which proposal wins? Drop your thoughts in the comments, and stay tuned to Meme Insider for the latest in meme tokens, DeFi news, and blockchain insights to level up your crypto game.