TL;DR

• The ticker GLAZE is widely associated with a Solana memecoin.
• The Base address 0xb9a7a44ec98393a9b0da44235c93a27623598777 does not show strong, verifiable activity on major Base explorers at the time of review.
• Treat the Base token as unverified until on-chain and community signals improve.
• The Solana “Glaze” has documented history, but low liquidity and volume; do not confuse it with any Base token using the same name.

What this page covers

This page focuses on the Base chain address 0xb9a7a44ec98393a9b0da44235c93a27623598777 and clarifies how it relates to the widely referenced Solana memecoin “Glaze” (GLAZE). If you’re researching the Base token, you’ll find verification steps, comparison notes, and practical safety tips.

Quick facts about the Base address

• Ticker/name observed: Glaze (GLAZE) — naming overlaps with the Solana token.
• Chain: Base (an Ethereum Layer 2).
• Address: 0xb9a7a44ec98393a9b0da44235c93a27623598777
• Status: No prominent listings or strong activity signals on Base at the time of writing.

What we found on Base

Searches on Base block explorers did not return evidence of an established, active GLAZE token at the given address:

• Basescan: https://basescan.org/
• OKLink Base: https://www.oklink.com/base
• Blockscout Base: https://base.blockscout.com/

This suggests one of the following:

• It’s a very new, inactive, or abandoned deployment.
• It’s a lookalike using the same name as the Solana token.
• The community footprint (liquidity, holders, verified socials) has not formed yet.

Until there’s clear on-chain activity and credible social proof, consider this address unverified.

How to verify a Base token safely

If you decide to research further, use these checks:

• Contract page on explorers
  • Confirm token name, symbol, decimals, total supply, and whether the source code is verified.
  • Look for proxy patterns or upgradeability flags.
• Holders and distribution
  • Check top holders and whether deployer/owner wallets retain outsized control.
• Liquidity and DEX pools
  • Look for pools that actually hold the token and the paired asset (e.g., ETH, USDC). Thin or newly seeded pools are high risk.
• Transaction history
  • Regular swaps and transfers from diverse wallets are healthier signals than a single wallet bouncing funds.
• Socials and website
  • Validate official links from the contract page. Beware of mismatched or newly created socials with no organic engagement.
• Audits and safety tools
  • Independent audits (if any) and basic checks for honeypots or high taxes help surface red flags.

The Solana “Glaze” (GLAZE): not the same as the Base address

The best-known Glaze (GLAZE) runs on Solana and is described as a meme coin themed around “glazing” (over-the-top hype or flattery). Key notes from public data:

• Network: Solana (different chain and address format).
• Supply: Circulating supply reported around 846.09 million GLAZE (close to 100% of supply).
• Market profile: Very low market cap and volume; trading has been intermittent on some venues.
• Price history: All-time high around $0.0006105 (Nov 20, 2024) and all-time low around $0.00001009 (Apr 9, 2025), with current price well below peak.
• Where it’s been used/traded: Solana-native tools like Raydium (DEX) and Phantom (wallet) are commonly referenced for Solana tokens.

Important: Don’t assume the Base token is equivalent to the Solana GLAZE. They are on different chains, with different addresses and liquidity.

Where to research or trade (with caution)

If you explore the Base token at your own risk:

• GMGN.AI page for the Base address (analytics/trading tools): https://gmgn.ai/base/token/fV1R5sZ5_0xb9a7a44ec98393a9b0da44235c93a27623598777
• Base-native DEXs and tools (use the exact token address and verify pools before interacting):
  • Aerodrome: https://aerodrome.finance/
  • Uniswap (Base): https://app.uniswap.org/
• Bridging to Base (for fees/liquidity management): https://bridge.base.org/

If you’re actually seeking the Solana GLAZE:

• Raydium (Solana DEX): https://raydium.io/
• Phantom wallet: https://phantom.app/
• Always paste the correct Solana token mint to avoid impostors.

Tip: Whether on Base or Solana, start with very small test transactions and scrutinize slippage, taxes, and transferability.

Why the confusion happens

• Ticker overlap: Meme coins often reuse catchy tickers across chains.
• EVM vs. Solana addresses: EVM addresses start with 0x; Solana uses a different format entirely. Mixing them up is a common mistake.
• Fragmented listings: Early or niche tokens might not appear on major dashboards right away, creating an info gap.

Developer and advanced due diligence

• Likely standard on Base: ERC-20 (but confirm in the verified source code).
• Check for:
  • Mint/burn permissions and role-based access control.
  • Trading guards or taxes (transfer hooks).
  • Pausable or blacklist mechanisms.
  • Upgradeability (UUPS/Transparent proxy) and who controls the admin.
• Review deployer history
  • Examine the deployer wallet’s past contracts and behavior to assess risk.

Risk reminders

• Meme tokens are highly speculative and can be illiquid.
• Low-volume tokens are susceptible to price manipulation.
• Lack of audits and anonymous teams increase risk.
• Never rely on a name alone; always verify using the contract address on the correct chain.

Bottom line

• The Base address 0xb9a7a44ec98393a9b0da44235c93a27623598777 currently lacks strong public signals of an active, established token.
• The widely referenced “Glaze (GLAZE)” with meaningful history is on Solana and is a different asset altogether.
• If you proceed on Base, verify everything on-chain, confirm real liquidity, and use reputable tools.