autorenew
How Not to Build Bullshit Blockchains: A Guide to Stronger Crypto Networks

How Not to Build Bullshit Blockchains: A Guide to Stronger Crypto Networks

Sreeram Kannan discussing blockchain security

Hey there, crypto enthusiasts! If you’ve been scrolling through X lately, you might have stumbled upon a hot take from Sreeram Kannan (@sreeramkannan) on June 27, 2025. In a tweet that’s got the blockchain community buzzing, he dropped a gem: “How not to build bullshit blockchains.” This post, linked to a deeper thread debunking economic security myths, is a wake-up call for anyone building or investing in meme tokens and other crypto projects. Let’s dive into what this means and why it matters—especially for those of us at meme-insider.com who love keeping you in the loop on the latest blockchain tech!

What’s the Buzz About?

Sreeram’s tweet points to a detailed thread where he tackles the idea that economic security in proof-of-stake (PoS) systems—like the one powering Ethereum—is just a “meme.” For those new to this, PoS is a way blockchains pick validators (the folks who confirm transactions) based on how much crypto they hold and are willing to “stake” as collateral. It’s a greener alternative to proof-of-work (PoW), which guzzles energy like Bitcoin mining. But some folks are skeptical, claiming PoS doesn’t really secure networks. Sreeram’s here to set the record straight.

In his thread, he busts eight myths, showing how economic security isn’t just hype. For example, he argues that delegation with slashing (where validators lose stake if they misbehave) forces people to pick trustworthy operators. He also explains that forking—a process where a blockchain splits—takes time, so instant transaction finality relies on economic security to hold things together. Pretty cool, right?

Why This Matters for Meme Tokens

If you’re into meme tokens (think Dogecoin or Shiba Inu), you might wonder how this applies. Well, many meme projects run on blockchains that use PoS or similar systems. A weak foundation can lead to hacks, forks, or even total collapse—bad news for your portfolio! Sreeram’s advice pushes for self-enforcing chains where security is baked in, not tacked on. This could inspire developers to build stronger meme token networks, making them less “bullshit” and more reliable.

The Ethereum Edge

Sreeram gives a shoutout to Ethereum, which nailed PoS with its 2022 Merge. He suggests other ecosystems are jealous because they can’t match Ethereum’s real economic security. This isn’t just bragging—Ethereum’s design penalizes bad behavior (like censoring transactions) and rewards good actors. For meme token creators, studying Ethereum’s approach could be a game-changer.

Debunking the Myths

Let’s break down a couple of Sreeram’s myth-busting points:

  • Myth 1: Delegation means no security. Nope! Slashing keeps validators honest, so you’re not just trusting randoms.
  • Myth 2: Forking fixes everything. Not true—forking takes a week, so you need security for instant transactions.
  • Myth 7: PoW is better. Actually, PoS lets you burn or redistribute stakes, unlike PoW’s mining gear.

He even tosses in a tool called “stakesure,” letting users buy their own security, which could make staking rewards market-driven instead of arbitrary. Pretty innovative!

What’s Next for Blockchain Builders?

Sreeram’s call to action is clear: build self-enforcing chains or risk ending up with “bullshit committee chains” (think centralized control by anonymous internet folks). For meme token devs, this is a chance to level up. Imagine a meme coin with rock-solid security—it could outlast the hype and become a legit player.

Join the Conversation

This topic’s heating up on X, with folks like @sassal0x cheering Ethereum’s PoS and others debating the future. What do you think? Drop your thoughts in the comments or hit us up on Twitter to chat about building better blockchains. And if you want more deep dives into meme tokens and tech, stick with meme-insider.com—we’ve got your back!

You might be interested