TL;DR

• The LAURA token at 0xa39819b999b2471bfdf03d1d8b6f93c83fe8caba is a BEP-20 contract on BNB Chain, but public explorer data is inconsistent: BscScan shows zero total supply and a $0 price, while still listing over 10,000 holders—an unusual combination that warrants caution.
• Marketing materials link LAURA to “Remittix,” a remittance-focused “PayFi” project claiming a large presale, a completed CertiK audit, and pending exchange listings. These claims should be independently verified via official sources.
• Treat this token as high risk until you can verify supply, liquidity, and contract safety directly on-chain. Use the step-by-step checks below before interacting or trading.

What we can verify on-chain right now

• Chain and standard: LAURA is deployed on BNB Chain as a BEP-20 token.
• Contract: 0xa39819b999b2471bfdf03d1d8b6f93c83fe8caba
• Explorer snapshot (subject to change):
  • Total supply reported as 0
  • Price reported as $0.00
  • Holders reported as ~10,816
  • Contract source not publicly verified on BscScan (limits transparency into functions like mint, blacklist, trading pause, fee changes)
• What this means in plain English:
  • Zero supply with thousands of holders is an anomaly. It can signal a migration, a burn/misreporting edge case, or simply broken metadata. Either way, it’s a red flag until clarified.
  • Unverified source code makes it difficult to assess risks like hidden taxes, transfer limits, or owner controls.

What the marketing says (Remittix narrative)

Several off-chain materials position LAURA as the native token of “Remittix,” a payments/remittance project aiming to simplify crypto-to-bank transfers with no hidden fees. Highlights to verify:

• Presale reportedly surpassed $19.5M
• “CertiK audit completed” with no critical issues
• Q3 beta wallet targeting multi-chain support (BNB Chain, Solana, Ethereum)
• First CEX listing to be announced after $20M presale milestone
• Links shared publicly:
  • Site: remittix.io
  • Aggregated links: linktr.ee/remittix
  • Giveaway: Gleam campaign

Important: These are marketing claims. Always confirm via official channels and third-party verifications (e.g., audit portals, exchange announcements, explorer data).

Reconciling the contradictions

Why do we see zero supply and price on BscScan alongside a strong marketing narrative?

• Early-stage or migrated contract: The marketed token could have moved to a different address, or the current contract could be deprecated.
• Data mismatch: The contract may not expose supply in a way BscScan reads, or metadata is outdated.
• Abandoned/unlaunched path: The promoted roadmap may not have materialized on-chain at this address.

Also note there are other “LAURA” tokens on BNB Chain with different addresses and tiny market footprints. Name collisions are common; always match the exact contract address you intend to interact with.

Step-by-step due diligence (5–10 minutes)

1. Confirm the official contract
   • Start from official channels (website, X, Telegram, Discord). Look for a pinned post with the contract address. Cross-check it with BscScan.
2. Check the contract on BscScan
   • Is the source code verified?
   • Read the contract tab for owner privileges (trading pause, mint, blacklist, variable tax).
   • Review recent transactions for normal transfer behavior.
3. Holder distribution
   • Open the “Holders” tab:
     • Are top wallets centralized (team/owner/DEX router)?
     • Do any wallets hold excessive supply (e.g., >10–20%)?
4. Liquidity health
   • On PancakeSwap, attempt to load the pair by pasting the contract.
   • Check whether there’s a live pool, total liquidity, and recent volume. Thin liquidity = high slippage and exit risk.
5. Audit claims
   • If a “CertiK audit” is advertised, find and read it on CertiK’s official site or portal, not from screenshots. Confirm the exact contract address audited matches the address above.
6. Team and roadmap
   • Is there a doxxed team, clear roadmap, and consistent updates? Dead social feeds are a red flag.
7. Test a tiny trade
   • If you still proceed, consider a tiny test transaction. Observe:
     • Actual tax taken
     • Whether you can sell back (honeypot check)
     • Slippage required to execute

Tracking and trading tools

If/when LAURA shows real liquidity, you can monitor and trade via:

• PancakeSwap (BNB Chain DEX): pancakeswap.finance
• GMGN.AI token page: https://gmgn.ai/eth/token/fV1R5sZ5_0xa39819b999b2471bfdf03d1d8b6f93c83fe8caba
• DEXTools: dextools.io
• GeckoTerminal: geckoterminal.com
• Market trackers (once/if listed): CoinMarketCap and CoinGecko

Tip: Always paste the exact contract address to avoid impostor pairs.

Key risks at a glance

• Zero supply and price on the explorer: Strong caution signal until clarified.
• Unverified contract code: Limited visibility into privileged functions and tokenomics.
• Multiple “LAURA” tokens exist: Easy to mix up contracts—verify, verify, verify.
• Presale/airdrop hype: Treat giveaways and large presale claims skeptically unless independently confirmed.
• Liquidity risk: Without deep, locked liquidity, price can be volatile and exits uncertain.

If you already hold LAURA

• Manually add the token in your wallet with the contract address if it doesn’t appear automatically.
• Track the project’s official channels for any migration notices or new contract addresses.
• Before any further buys/sells, do the quick checks above—especially liquidity and sellability.

Bottom line

Right now, the on-chain data for LAURA at 0xa39819b999b2471bfdf03d1d8b6f93c83fe8caba doesn’t line up with the bullish marketing narrative. Until supply, liquidity, and contract transparency are verifiably resolved, treat this as high risk. If the Remittix vision proves real, you’ll see it reflected in verifiable on-chain metrics, audited code, and healthy liquidity. Until then, protect your capital with disciplined, checklist-driven due diligence.