TL;DR

The MAYA token at 0x557305d6c3b2cdc45f9e10473ac3c03914ca9982 exists on BNB Chain (BEP‑20), but public, verifiable details are scarce.
No clear linkage to the better-known Maya Protocol ecosystem; its official tokens are CACAO (native) and a revenue-sharing MAYA not confirmed at this BNB address.
Market data (price, liquidity, holders) for this specific contract is limited or absent on major trackers. Treat it as high risk until proven otherwise.
If you decide to explore, verify the exact contract, inspect liquidity and holders, and start with minimal exposure.

What this page covers

Quick facts

Symbol: MAYA (shared by multiple unrelated tokens across chains)
Contract: 0x557305d6c3b2cdc45f9e10473ac3c03914ca9982 on BNB Chain (BEP‑20)
Explorer: BscScan contract page shows the token exists, but lacks rich analytics commonly seen on active projects
Status: Obscure/low-activity; limited or no verified source code, holders, liquidity, or official references publicly visible

What we could (and couldn’t) verify

Existence: The contract address resolves on BscScan, confirming deployment on BNB Chain.
Project linkage: No verified official website, whitepaper, socials, or docs tied to this exact address were found.
Listings and data providers: Major aggregators (e.g., CoinMarketCap, CoinGecko) do not reliably surface price/liquidity for this specific contract. Other tokens named MAYA do appear on trackers, but they point to different addresses and sometimes even different chains.
Activity: No clear, sustained liquidity pools or meaningful trading volume were identifiable for this address at the time of research.

Is this the Maya Protocol token?

Maya Protocol is a cross-chain DEX (a “friendly fork” of THORChain) with CACAO as its native token and a separate MAYA revenue-sharing token in its design.
Crucially, we did not find this BNB Chain address in the protocol’s official docs, explorers, or announcements.
Bottom line: Treat this MAYA on BNB Chain as unrelated to Maya Protocol unless you see an explicit, official confirmation from Maya Protocol’s channels.

Market and trading footprint

Price and liquidity: We did not find robust, verifiable liquidity pools or consistent market data for this address on common BNB Chain DEXs.
Holders: Low or undisclosed holder counts typically imply minimal adoption or indexing gaps. Either way, it’s a signal to slow down and double-check.

Where to check and trade (if you proceed)

Always confirm the exact contract address before interacting with any pool or pair. Impersonator tokens are common.
Helpful starting points:
- Dedicated token page: https://gmgn.ai/eth/token/fV1R5sZ5_0x557305d6c3b2cdc45f9e10473ac3c03914ca9982
- BNB Chain DEX frontends like PancakeSwap can be used to simulate a swap and inspect the pair address and pool liquidity, but do not proceed unless the pair contract matches the token address you trust.
Tip: Cross-reference more than one source (explorer + DEX UI + independent trackers) to avoid spoofed data.

Hands-on DYOR checklist

Verify the contract address character-by-character.
Check if the source code is verified. If not, treat as higher risk.
Review Read/Write functions for:
- Trading fees or taxes
- Blacklist/whitelist controls
- Mint/burn permissions
- Max wallet/transaction limits
Inspect the token’s Events (Transfers, Ownership changes).

Look at top holders. Red flags:
- One or two wallets holding an outsized share
- A deployer or team wallet controlling liquidity or supply
- Centralized exchange or bridge wallets mislabeled as “holders” masking control

If a DEX pair exists, check:
- Total liquidity value
- How much of the supply is in the pool
- Whether LP tokens are locked or burned (and for how long)
Thin liquidity = high price impact and heightened rug risk.

Try a tiny test trade (“dust”) to assess:
- Slippage required
- Hidden transfer taxes
- Reverts or suspicious behaviors
Use an approvals dashboard to limit and revoke allowances after testing.

Search the exact contract address across Twitter, Reddit, Telegram, and relevant communities.
Look for audits or code reviews. No audit is not a deal-breaker for microcaps, but it does increase risk.
If the project claims ties to Maya Protocol, verify via Maya Protocol’s official docs, site, and social channels—not screenshots.

Key risks to weigh

Transparency risk: Lack of verified code, official docs, or social presence makes it difficult to establish legitimacy.
Liquidity risk: Minimal or absent liquidity can trap buyers; exiting may be impossible without large slippage.
Contract risk: Unverified or privileged functions (mint/blacklist) can be abused.
Market risk: Low-float, low-visibility tokens are vulnerable to manipulation and extreme volatility.
Identity confusion: Multiple unrelated “MAYA” tokens exist across chains; mixing them up is easy and costly.

If you still want to interact

Use a trusted wallet (e.g., MetaMask/Trust Wallet) and a fresh address if you’re testing unknown contracts.
Start extremely small. Assume you may not be able to sell.
Double-check that every interface (DEX UI, tracker, analytics page) references the exact contract: 0x557305d6c3b2cdc45f9e10473ac3c03914ca9982.
Revoke token approvals promptly after testing using an approvals manager.
Never bridge or wrap assets based on unofficial links.

Helpful resources

Conclusion

The MAYA token at 0x5573…9982 on BNB Chain has limited verifiable data and no confirmed link to the well-documented Maya Protocol ecosystem.
Treat this contract as high-risk until you can validate code, ownership, liquidity, and genuine community presence.
If you explore it, do so cautiously: verify addresses, start tiny, and prepare for illiquidity.

Meme Insider

MAYA Token (0x557305d6c3b2cdc45f9e10473ac3c03914ca9982) on BNB Chain: What We Know, Risks, and How to DYOR