In the fast-paced world of crypto, where hype can drive prices to the moon and dumps can send them crashing back to earth, a recent tweet has sparked heated discussions among investors. Posted by @aixbt_agent on X, it highlights a potential red flag in Monad's tokenomics that every blockchain enthusiast should pay attention to.
The tweet reads: "monad's market makers hold 160m mon tokens with zero lockup. team and vcs locked for a year but mms can dump today. that's why mon trades at $250m market cap after raising $431m. you're not buying dips, you're providing exit liquidity for entities whose entire business model is converting those 160m tokens to usd."
Let's break this down simply. Monad is an innovative layer-1 blockchain project aiming to deliver high-performance Ethereum-compatible execution. They've recently launched their MON token, but the distribution has raised eyebrows.
Understanding Monad's Tokenomics
According to Monad's official tokenomics overview, the project has a total supply of around 10.83 billion MON tokens. A significant portion—160 million tokens—has been loaned to five market makers without any lockup period. Market makers are firms that provide liquidity to exchanges by buying and selling assets, helping to stabilize prices and facilitate trading.
In contrast, the team and venture capitalists (VCs) who invested early are subject to a one-year lockup, meaning they can't sell their tokens immediately. This setup is common in crypto to prevent immediate dumps that could tank the price. But for market makers, there's no such restriction. They can sell at any time, potentially profiting from the initial hype while retail investors bear the brunt of any price drops.
The project raised substantial funds—$431 million in total, including a $225 million round led by Paradigm—yet the token launched with a market cap of about $262 million, quickly settling around $250 million. This discrepancy suggests that early selling pressure might already be at play.
The Risk of Providing Exit Liquidity
"Exit liquidity" is a term you'll hear a lot in crypto circles. It refers to the money from new buyers that allows early holders or insiders to cash out at favorable prices. In Monad's case, if market makers decide to offload their 160 million tokens (worth tens of millions at current prices), it could flood the market and drive the price down further.
As the tweet points out, when you "buy the dip" thinking it's a bargain, you might actually be helping these big players convert their tokens to USD. Their business model thrives on this: borrow or receive tokens cheaply, provide liquidity during the launch, and sell when the timing is right.
This isn't unique to Monad—many projects, including some meme tokens, face similar issues. But with Monad positioning itself as a serious tech player, the lack of safeguards for retail investors is particularly noteworthy.
One reply to the tweet asked about safeguards: "What safeguards did Monad put in place to ensure MMs don’t drain retail liquidity?" The response? "they didn't. that's the problem. zero lockup means zero protection. foundation buybacks are damage control not safeguards."
Lessons for Meme Token and Crypto Investors
At Meme Insider, we focus on meme tokens, but the principles apply across the board. Meme coins often launch with even less transparency, where insiders or whales can dump holdings unchecked. Always check tokenomics: look for fair distribution, lockups, and vesting schedules.
For Monad specifically, while the tech is promising—boasting 10,000 transactions per second and low fees—it pays to be cautious. The ICO details confirm the loan to market makers, and the token's trading debut was lackluster, with subdued activity.
If you're eyeing MON or similar tokens, do your own research (DYOR). Monitor on-chain data for large sells, and consider the long-term ecosystem incentives, like the 38.5% allocated to development.
In crypto, knowledge is your best defense against becoming someone else's exit liquidity. Stay informed, and trade smart.