Nansen dropped a quick but loud alpha bomb today on $TIBBIR (yeah, that's RIBBIT spelled backwards – the ultimate degen naming flex), and the data is actually pretty spicy.
Over the past week, while the overall top 100 addresses only increased their bags by +1.25%, smart money wallets went +2.04%, showing clear conviction even as price consolidated around the low $0.2x range.
The standout moves came from known sharp wallets:
- pp_vault scooped +157.2K
- One 30D Smart Trader added +100.9K
- Another 30D Smart Trader grabbed +235.7K
There was one distribution play (-135K from stakedethereum.eth), but net flow is clearly green on the smart money side.
The broader holder dashboard backs it up – top 100 now sitting on 511.09 M tokens (49% of supply) with a distribution score of 18, which for a fresh meme coin isn't terrible (most moonshots start heavily concentrated anyway).
Smart money balance specifically climbed to 23.49 M tokens, and you can see the yellow balance line starting to hook upward right as price put in a local bottom.
Ribbita is the Virtuals Protocol AI agent token that flipped the frog meme script – literally spelling "ribbit" backwards to dodge the usual PEPE clones while keeping the tired narrative. Running on Base, low fees, fast transactions, and now smart money quietly stacking while retail is still sleeping on it?
That's the exact setup that has sent countless memes 10-50x in the past.
The fact Nansen bothered to post this unprompted means their internal alerts are pinging. When the top on-chain analytics team in the game starts spotlighting your token's wallet activity, people notice.
Obviously nothing is guaranteed in meme coins (we've all seen smart money get rekt too), but when multiple labeled profitable traders are adding six-figure token amounts during a dip... you pay attention.
$TIBBIR.
Watch the smart money balance line closely over the next few days. If it keeps trending higher while price holds these levels, this frog might actually start hopping.
Meme season never sleeps.
Ribbit. Or should I say... RIBBIT backwards.