Note: This brief focuses on the token at contract address 0xd3bc30de65da0f7d02085677f6136bccfafcfaae on BNB Chain. There are similarly named tokens on other chains; always rely on the contract address you intend to interact with.

Quick take

• Contract: 0xd3bc30de65da0f7d02085677f6136bccfafcfaae on BNB Chain, shown as PAWS on BscScan; some listings call it PAWSE. Name mismatch is a first-layer risk—address verification beats ticker names.
• Memecoin-style positioning with no clearly documented utility or official website for this contract.
• Audit signals conflict: one scanner summary shows “low honeypot risk,” yet the same listing also warns it “may be a honeypot or have restrictive sells.” Treat this contradiction as a red flag until independently verified.
• Market data across aggregators is inconsistent, with reports of minimal or halted trading in recent weeks—indicative of very low liquidity and potential inactivity.

What we can verify today

• Chain and token page: The address above resolves on BscScan as a BEP-20 token.
• Naming discrepancy: BscScan shows “PAWS,” while some trackers list “PAWSE.” This can create confusion and increases phishing risk. Stick to the address, not the name.
• Memecoin-style description: Aggregators describe it in community/meme terms rather than offering a clear utility, team, or roadmap.

Audit and contract signals (from third-party scanners)

A snapshot of common checks reported by one scanner for this address includes:

• Honeypot risk: flagged as low in the checklist, but the listing also carries a separate honeypot/restrictive-sells warning banner.
• Taxes: Buy/Sell reportedly 0%.
• Blacklist/whitelist: none found in the checklist.
• Ownership: “likely renounced” and “permanent ownership likely” were indicated; verify this directly in the contract before trusting it.
• Mintability, pausability, external calls, anti-whale, cooldowns: none found or unlikely per the checklist view.

Why the contradiction matters:

• A “honeypot” is code that lets you buy but blocks selling or imposes constraints that make selling impractical. When a page simultaneously shows low risk in a checklist but adds a honeypot warning banner, assume worst-case until you test it yourself with tiny amounts.

Market data consistency check

Public data (late Aug 2025) was contradictory across trackers:

• Market cap: wildly divergent numbers; some list “not available.”
• Volume: some report negligible volume, others cite higher figures; CoinGecko noted that trading had stopped on listed venues in recent days.
• Circulating supply: self-reported vs. unverified figures don’t align.

Bottom line: Illiquidity plus unverified supply makes execution risky and slippage likely. Price discovery may be unreliable or stale.

Beware of cross-chain ticker confusion

• Another token named $PAWSE appeared on Solana around June 2025 with a different address and backstory. That is a different asset.
• The address in this brief is on BNB Chain. Never rely on a ticker or logo alone—always match the exact contract address before you trade.

If you still plan to interact or trade

Given the risks, some traders still choose to explore. If you do:

• Charting/tracking: You can review the token page on platforms like GMGN.AI to monitor activity, holders, and real-time trades.
• DEX route: If liquidity exists, BNB Chain tokens typically trade on PancakeSwap. Double-check the token address in the interface before swapping.
• On-chain verification: Always inspect the contract on BscScan and review holders, liquidity pool (LP) status, and recent transactions.

Note: Some trackers indicated trading may have stopped on listed venues recently. If your swap fails or the UI shows errors, do not force slippage higher—step back and reassess.

Hands-on DYOR checklist (practical and fast)

• Confirm identity:
  • Match the exact contract address in your wallet, DEX, and any tracker you use.
  • Check token name/symbol mismatches; scammers exploit these.
• LP and holders:
  • On BscScan, find the top holders. Is the LP token locked or burned? A single wallet holding most supply or LP is a major risk.
• Ownership and privileges:
  • Confirm whether the owner is renounced. Look for functions like mint(), setTax, pause/unpause, blacklist/whitelist. If present and owner is not renounced, risk rises.
• Tax and sellability:
  • Use multiple honeypot detectors, not just one. Then do a live micro-test:
    • Buy a tiny amount.
    • Immediately attempt to sell the same amount.
    • If the sell fails, or needs extreme slippage, stop.
• Trading status:
  • Check recent trades on BscScan and on trackers like GMGN.AI. No recent on-chain activity often means zero liquidity or a dead market.
• Socials and docs:
  • Look for an official website, X/Telegram, or GitHub. Absence of any official presence is a risk, especially for new or obscure tokens.
• Approvals hygiene:
  • If you tested a swap, review and revoke any lingering approvals using your wallet or a reputable revoker tool.

Key risks to weigh

• Honeypot/restrictive sells: Conflicting scanner messages plus market inactivity justify maximum caution.
• Low liquidity: Slippage, failed swaps, and price manipulation become more likely.
• Data opacity: No verified supply data or credible project documentation reduces trust.
• Ticker collision: Similar names across chains (PAW, PAWS, PAWSE) increase the odds of mistakes or phishing.

The bottom line

PAWSE/PAWS at 0xd3bc30de65da0f7d02085677f6136bccfafcfaae exhibits multiple red flags: naming inconsistencies, contradictory honeypot signals, and highly inconsistent market data with indications of halted trading. For most traders and builders, this is a watch-and-wait scenario at best. If you still engage, do it with tiny test amounts, verify sellability first, and lean on on-chain evidence over aggregator widgets.