autorenew
Pump.fun COO's Take on $PUMP: How Paying Small Creators Profitably Could Make It Internet Huge

Pump.fun COO's Take on $PUMP: How Paying Small Creators Profitably Could Make It Internet Huge

If you've ever scrolled through endless crypto Twitter threads wondering why some projects skyrocket while others fizzle out, this one hits different. Kevin Simback, COO at Delphi Labs and a crypto veteran from IBM and McKinsey days, just dropped a gem after binge-listening to an interview with Pump.fun co-founder Noah (aka @sapijiju) on a red

- The main post quotes Delphi Digital about an interview with a @pumpdotfun co-founder discussing $PUMP.
-eye flight. His takeaway? The secret sauce for platforms like Pump.fun isn't just hype—it's cracking the code on paying small creators fairly and turning a profit. Do that, and you're not talking crypto moonshots; you're eyeing internet-scale dominance.

For the uninitiated, Pump.fun is that wild Solana-based playground where anyone can launch a meme token in seconds, turning silly ideas into viral sensations. It's minted billions in liquidity (over $1.5B in SOL locked in pools, per the chat) and shifted how we think about token creation—no gatekeepers, just pure, chaotic energy. But Noah's interview, hosted by Delphi Digital, peels back the curtain on something bigger: fixing the broken creator economy.

The Broken Model Creators Know Too Well

Think about it. Platforms like YouTube or Twitch rake in ad dollars, but crumbs go to the little guys grinding for views. Crypto promised decentralization, yet most rewards still flow to whales and influencers. Noah calls it out bluntly: "Current creator models are broken." Pump.fun flips the script by prioritizing content first—organic growth over forced virality. Imagine a world where your niche meme thread or quick Solana tutorial earns real $PUMP tokens, not just likes.

Simback's lightbulb moment came mid-flight: If Pump can make this sustainable (profitable buybacks already in play), it democratizes earnings. Small creators fuel 80% of the internet's pulse—the memes, the hot takes, the community vibes. Empower them, and the network effect explodes. We're talking TikTok-level adoption, but on blockchain rails.

$PUMP's War Chest: Fuel for the Fire

Noah hints at Pump's massive treasury—enough to experiment wildly. What if they airdropped to active creators? Or built tools for seamless token-gated streams? The interview touches on ditching traditional revenue traps for a "grow the pie" mindset: More creators thriving means more eyes, more liquidity, more everything.

This resonates hard in meme token land, where $PUMP isn't just a ticker—it's a bet on cultural liquidity. Solana's speed keeps fees low, letting micro-payments flow without friction. And with crypto's cycle of human nature (boom, bust, repeat), platforms that adapt win big. Pump's already proving it: From zero to hero in months, challenging even blue-chip narratives.

Why This Matters for Blockchain Builders

As someone who's edited countless CoinDesk pieces on tokenomics, I see echoes of early Ethereum dApps here. Pump.fun isn't reinventing the wheel—it's turbocharging it with meme magic. For devs and degens alike, it's a masterclass in product-market fit: Learn from failures (Noah's crypto scars run deep), innovate on distribution, and let culture lead.

If you're building on Solana or eyeing meme plays, watch $PUMP closely. Simback's "Long $PUMP" isn't blind hype—it's a nod to a thesis that could redefine how we value digital creativity. Small creators aren't sidekicks; they're the stars. Platforms that get that? They'll own the next internet wave.

What's your take—can $PUMP pull off profitable payouts at scale? Drop your thoughts below, and let's meme this forward.

You might be interested