Quick take

• The contract address 0xcff0986dd3faf244cae9d876936c33065de64444 on the BNB Chain currently has no public footprint on major explorers or aggregators (no verified source, no transactions, no market listings).
• Multiple unrelated tokens also use the “RETSA” ticker on BNB Chain. Some have been flagged as high risk (including honeypot behavior and modifiable taxes). These are different contracts and should not be conflated with the address above.
• If you’re evaluating any token labeled “RETSA,” verify the exact contract address first and run standard security and liquidity checks before interacting.

What we can confirm about 0xcff0…4444

Searches on leading BNB Chain explorers like BscScan and BSCTrace return no meaningful on-chain data for this specific address. In practice, that can mean:

• It’s not deployed on BNB Chain mainnet yet (it could be a placeholder or test address; learn more about testnets here: testnet).
• A contract was generated but never finalized or verified.
• Activity is so minimal that indexers have nothing to show (no supply, holders, or transfers visible).

With no on-chain telemetry, we cannot determine supply, holders, taxes, liquidity, or utility for this address.

Beware of “RETSA” lookalikes and ticker reuse

“RETSA” appears on other, unrelated tokens across BNB Chain. Two notable clusters from public scans:

• RETSACUIN ($RETSA): Multiple distinct contracts have surfaced under this name. Some were flagged as potential honeypots with extreme sell taxes (reports included 0% buy tax and up to 100% sell tax), plus dangerous functions (blacklists, modifiable taxes/balances) and incomplete audits.
• ASTER Reverse (RETSA): Another variant reported under a different contract, with small liquidity, a reported tax (e.g., 5%), and similar warnings about risky or unaudited functions. Figures like price, market cap, and 24h volume have been cited in third-party trackers but vary by source and over time.

Why this matters: tickers are not unique on-chain. Multiple unrelated projects can share “RETSA,” and some may be malicious. Always verify by contract address, not by name or ticker.

How to verify before you interact

Use this checklist to reduce risk:

1. Confirm the contract on explorers
   • Paste the exact address into BscScan. Look for verified source code, compiler settings, contract creation data, and read/write contract tabs.
   • Check “Token Tracker” details (supply, decimals, holders) and whether there’s any transaction history.
2. Read the code and flags
   • Scan for owner-only functions (blacklist, pause trading, mint/burn without limits, fee/tax changes, maxTx/maxWallet edits).
   • Beware proxies and upgradability without transparent governance.
3. Assess taxes and sellability
   • If taxes exist, ensure they’re reasonable and immutable or clearly governed. Honeypots often allow buys but block or penalize sells.
   • Test with a tiny amount to confirm sell functionality when in doubt.
4. Review liquidity
   • Check whether liquidity is added, locked, and how much is in the pool. Thin or unlocked LP is a classic red flag.
5. Inspect holder distribution
   • Large allocations held by a single EOA or deployer-controlled wallets increase rug risk.
6. Check project presence
   • Is there a website, whitepaper, or audit? Are social channels active? Are devs or multisig addresses public?
7. DYOR across sources
   • Cross-check with multiple trackers and communities. Start here for basics: Do Your Own Research.

Trading and discovery tools

• GMGN.AI token page: Use this dedicated page to monitor any emerging activity, basic risk signals, and trading context for the address: https://gmgn.ai/bsc/token/fV1R5sZ5_0xcff0986dd3faf244cae9d876936c33065de64444
• BscScan: The authoritative on-chain view for creation, holders, and code verification: BscScan for 0xcff0…4444
• PancakeSwap: The primary DEX on BNB Chain is PancakeSwap. Note: for this specific address, no active pairs or liquidity have been confirmed. Do not trade unless you independently verify the pair, liquidity, taxes, and sellability.

Tip: Even if a pair appears somewhere, verify it’s tied to the exact contract you intend to trade. Scammers often seed fake pairs with copycat tickers.

Red‑flag checklist for “RETSA” tokens

• 100% or very high sell tax; or sells consistently failing.
• Blacklist or “anti-bot” functions that can arbitrarily block wallets.
• Owner can modify fees, balances, or trading parameters at will.
• Upgradable proxy with opaque admin; no multisig or timelocks.
• Unlocked or tiny liquidity; short or missing LP locks.
• Concentrated holder distribution (top wallet(s) can nuke the market).
• No verified source code or mismatched compiler settings.
• Brand reuse: same ticker/name across multiple unrelated contracts.

Bottom line

• For 0xcff0986dd3faf244cae9d876936c33065de64444, there’s currently no verifiable public data on major explorers or aggregators. Treat it as unverified until proven otherwise.
• The “RETSA” ticker appears on other, unrelated BNB Chain tokens—some flagged as risky or honeypots. Do not assume any relationship between those and this address.
• If you choose to engage, proceed only after thorough verification of the exact contract, code, taxes, liquidity, and sellability—and start with negligible amounts.