If you’ve stumbled across the SANCHAN token on BNB Chain and want to know what’s real and what’s noise, here’s the short version: the contract at 0x8fee6149b8f70039d5a2c780c607ff344148955a exists on BNB Chain, but there’s limited verifiable information tying it to a recognized, active project. Below, we break down what we can confirm on-chain, why there’s confusion with other similarly named tokens, and how to protect yourself.

Identity check: not the same as the “San Chan (SAN)” you may know

• The well-known “San Chan (SAN)” meme project, inspired by Kantaro and his Shiba Inu, is primarily on Solana and has some multi-chain presence, but it uses different contract addresses. See background on the Solana-focused project via sources like Coincheckup and Binance posts, and note that the BSC address often cited for that project is different from the one above.
• On BNB Chain, the address we’re examining (0x8fee...955a) is listed on BscScan as “ShinChan (SCHAN),” which already hints at naming drift (SANCHAN vs. SCHAN).
• The existence of lookalike names is common in meme-token markets and can lead to confusion. We’ve also seen a separate “San Chan / WBNB” pair on BSC flagged as a potential honeypot at yet another address. Different name, different contract.

What the chain data says about 0x8fee...955a

• Contract standard: BEP-20 on BNB Chain (EVM-compatible, similar to ERC‑20).
• Supply and holders: BscScan currently shows a total supply of 1,000,000,000,000 and a very small holder base (around a dozen wallets). You can review live data on the BscScan token page: https://bscscan.com/token/0x8fee6149b8f70039d5a2c780c607ff344148955a
• Verification: The contract does not appear to be verified on BscScan. That reduces transparency because you can’t read human‑friendly source code—only bytecode.
• Activity and price: Transfers are sparse, and BscScan shows a price of $0.00, suggesting negligible liquidity and/or no recognized markets. It doesn’t show up on major tracking sites like CoinMarketCap or CoinGecko under this ticker.

Why the confusion happens

• Similar names, different chains: “San Chan (SAN)” is a known meme token brand, but primarily Solana‑native. Meanwhile, 0x8fee...955a on BNB Chain is labeled “ShinChan (SCHAN)” on BscScan—likely a nod to the Japanese franchise Crayon Shin‑chan, not the Shiba Inu “San Chan.”
• Multiple BSC contracts exist with overlapping names. One BSC address sometimes cited for “San Chan (SAN)” is different from the one above, which underscores the need to match names to exact contract addresses before taking any action.

BNB Chain quick context (why this matters)

• BNB Smart Chain is popular for low fees and fast throughput, which attracts meme tokens and experimental projects. That openness is great for builders but requires extra caution for buyers because anyone can deploy a token with any name.

Key risks to keep in mind

• Unverified contract: Without verified source code on BscScan, it’s harder to assess functions like taxes, minting, blacklist, or trading limits.
• Low liquidity: A price of $0.00 on explorers and no clear exchange listings mean you may not be able to enter or exit positions easily—if at all.
• Small holder base: With very few holders, any trade could swing the price drastically. Concentration risk is high.
• Naming confusion: Similar names can be used to piggyback on better-known brands. Always track the exact address you intend to interact with.

How to DYOR on this (or any) meme token

• Confirm the exact contract: Bookmark the BscScan page for the address you’re researching and never rely on name alone.
• Check contract status: On BscScan, look for a verified contract badge, ownership status (renounced or not), and read functions if verified. If it’s unverified, increase caution.
• Review holder distribution: See top holders and liquidity pool (LP) positions. If a few wallets control most tokens or LP, risk is elevated.
• Validate liquidity: Look up whether a PancakeSwap pair exists, how much WBNB and token are in the pool, and whether LP is locked.
• Inspect recent transfers: Sudden spikes, odd patterns, or inactivity can be signals.
• Protect approvals: If you’ve interacted with experimental contracts, manage approvals using tools like https://revoke.cash/
• Socials and docs: Legit projects usually publish an official site, whitepaper, and active socials (X/Telegram/Discord). If none exist, proceed with extreme caution.

Is SANCHAN (0x8fee...955a) tradable?

• At the time of writing, we don’t see credible evidence of deep liquidity or major exchange listings for this specific contract. If you still choose to explore trading:
  • Use a DEX you trust (for BNB Chain, PancakeSwap is the default) and double‑check you’re using the exact contract address.
  • Monitor real‑time token dashboards and discovery tools such as GMGN.AI: https://gmgn.ai/eth/token/fV1R5sZ5_0x8fee6149b8f70039d5a2c780c607ff344148955a
  • Be aware that “San Chan (SAN)” on other chains (e.g., Solana) trades elsewhere and is not the same as this BNB Chain address. Don’t mix them up.

For developers or token maintainers

• Verify the contract on BscScan to improve transparency.
• Publish a concise website, a basic whitepaper/one‑pager, and active social channels.
• Lock or time‑lock LP, outline tokenomics plainly, and communicate changes openly to build trust.

Bottom line

• SANCHAN at 0x8fee...955a looks like a low‑profile BEP‑20 token with minimal activity and no confirmed ties to the more visible “San Chan (SAN)” brand. If you’re considering any interaction, treat it as highly speculative. Match the exact address, verify on-chain details, and only risk what you can afford to lose.