Hey there, crypto enthusiasts! If you’ve been scrolling through X lately, you might have stumbled upon a fiery thread that’s got the blockchain community buzzing. Posted on June 29, 2025, by user json1444, this conversation kicks off with a screenshot of an exchange between Shadow36 and CutZilla that dives deep into the world of crypto influencers, success stories, and the controversial topic of exit liquidity (EL). Let’s break it down and see what it means for the meme token scene!

The Spark: Shadow36’s Rise from Nothing

The thread starts with Shadow36 proudly declaring, “Literally came from nothing bruh” and “It is so fuckin possible.” With 5.9K views, 33 likes, and a handful of retweets, it’s clear this struck a chord. Shadow36’s story resonates with many in the crypto space—someone who started with little and climbed the ranks through skill and persistence. For those new to this, exit liquidity refers to the process where influencers might promote a token to help themselves or early investors cash out, sometimes leaving followers holding the bag. Shadow’s post suggests his success isn’t tied to such tactics but rather genuine trading prowess.

CutZilla’s Challenge: A Genuine Question

CutZilla jumps in with a thought-provoking reply: “Can you honestly say you never shilled anything you didn’t believe in just to generate EL from your followers to get out of a trade? Genuine question.” This cuts to the heart of a big debate in the crypto world: Can influencers be trusted? The mention of “EL” here implies a strategy where a promoter might hype a token they no longer believe in, encouraging others to buy so they can sell their shares. It’s a bold call-out, and it’s sparked a wave of responses in the thread.

The Community Weighs In

The thread quickly snowballs as others chime in. json1444 argues that big names like Shadow36 and Mitch earned their fame through solid trades, not by relying on followers’ money to exit. Meanwhile, Jeetburner defends their own integrity, saying, “I have never shilled a single coin with the intention of exit liquidity either.” Users like narc even highlight Shadow’s kindness, recalling how he supported newbies, suggesting a karmic cycle of goodwill in the community.

But not everyone’s convinced. Armadillo points out that the original question from CutZilla remains unanswered, keeping the skepticism alive. This mix of support and doubt reflects the polarized views on influencer ethics in the meme token ecosystem.

What This Means for Meme Tokens

Meme tokens, like Dogecoin or newer projects on Solana, often thrive on community hype, making influencer credibility crucial. If followers feel manipulated through exit liquidity schemes, trust erodes, and the token’s value can crash. On the flip side, genuine success stories like Shadow36’s can inspire confidence and drive long-term growth. At meme-insider.com, we’re seeing more projects focus on transparency to build sustainable communities—something this thread highlights as a growing need.

Final Thoughts

This X thread is a microcosm of the crypto world’s ongoing struggle with trust and authenticity. Whether Shadow36 or others have ever used exit liquidity tactics remains unclear, but the conversation itself is a healthy check on the industry. As meme token enthusiasts, it’s up to us to stay informed and skeptical, digging into the fundamentals of any project before jumping in. What do you think—should influencers be held to a higher standard? Drop your thoughts in the comments, and let’s keep the discussion going!