autorenew
Why ICM is Struggling in Crypto: Toxic Culture vs. Infrastructure Debate

Why ICM is Struggling in Crypto: Toxic Culture vs. Infrastructure Debate

If you've been following the wild world of memecoins and crypto funding, you've probably heard whispers about Internet Capital Markets, or ICM for short. It's this fresh take on raising money for ideas—think turning your startup pitch into a tradable token right from the get-go, without begging VCs for scraps. Platforms like Believe App (built on Solana) let devs launch tokens via tools like Launchcoin, where anyone can buy in early, speculate, and potentially cash out big. Sounds revolutionary, right? But lately, there's been some serious buzz about why ICM isn't taking off as expected.

A recent X thread kicked off by @MiyaHedge and responded to by @edgarpavlovsky dives deep into the drama. Miya drops what they call a "blackpill"—that harsh truth pill—arguing that ICM's woes stem from building on the "wrong chain." We're talking Solana here, where everything moves at warp speed: holding times are in seconds, high-frequency traders dominate, and the vibe is all about quick pumps, dumps, and repeats. It's a casino mentality, not a conviction-holding ecosystem. Projects get treated like trades, not long-term builds.

Miya points fingers at Launchcoin as this cycle's big innovation—tokenizing everything to give the "casino" access to private markets—but says it was doomed by the wrong culture and framework. They call out Believe App's early decision to frame tokens as "non-utility memecoins" to dodge securities regs. Smart for avoiding legal headaches, but it backfired big time. Now, you've got ecosystems flooded with projects that aren't aligned with VC interests, poisoned by narratives like "RIP VC." Once you market something as a joke with "no promises, just vibes," good luck flipping the script to treat it like serious equity later on.

And here's the kicker: no one's addressing the exit problem. Real startups aim for acquisitions or IPOs, tying holder upside to those milestones. But in this memecoin setup, when a big buyout happens, founders might cash out while token holders are left with a worthless ticker. Miya even warned folks off buying certain tokens like $CLUELY if launched this way. Their verdict? ICM is "dead (for now)" until someone fixes these structural messes and launches something legit, paving the way for a "digital Shark Tank" era.

But Edgar Pavlovsky, the guy behind projects like Dark Research AI, isn't buying that infrastructure is the main villain. In his response, he flips the script: the real killer is the pervasive assumption that everything in crypto is a rug pull waiting to happen. Holders, traders, founders—even friends—constantly grill him on when he's gonna rug his own project, Dark. It's this insane, toxic undercurrent in the industry that's holding ICM back.

Edgar sees it as a societal-level problem, one that'll hurt to fix, and only a handful will step up. He's bootstrapping Dark from a tough spot precisely to push through this "brick wall." It's not just about tech; it's about rebuilding trust in a space where skepticism runs rampant.

This back-and-forth highlights a core tension in memecoins and beyond. On one hand, ICM democratizes funding—anyone can back an idea early, no gatekeepers needed. But without shaking off the rug-pull paranoia and aligning incentives properly, it's tough to build lasting ecosystems. Solana's speed is a double-edged sword: great for liquidity, but it fosters that hit-and-run trader culture Miya warns about.

If you're a blockchain builder or memecoin enthusiast, this debate is a wake-up call. Maybe the fix starts with better token designs that blend memecoin fun with real utility, or cultural shifts toward long-term holding. Platforms like Believe could tweak their branding to emphasize equity-like upside from day one. And for the community? Time to ditch the default distrust and support projects that prove their staying power.

As crypto evolves, ICM could indeed become the next big thing—a true internet-native capital market. But it'll take gutsy founders like Edgar to lead the charge. What's your take? Is it the tech, the culture, or both holding us back? Drop your thoughts in the comments below, and keep an eye on emerging ICM plays for that next moonshot.

You might be interested