In the fast-paced world of meme coins, launching a token as part of a strong team comes with its own set of challenges and strategies. A recent tweet from @baoskee, a key figure at daos.fun, sparked a conversation about the best ways to handle official coin launches without handing free profits to early bundlers or snipers.

Baoskee's take? If you're a solid team rolling out an official coin, bundling makes sense. For those new to the term, "bundling" here refers to the practice where the team secures a portion of the token supply early on, often by buying in bulk right at launch. The alternative, as Baoskee points out, is to kick off with a higher starting point on the bonding curve—say, at $500k or $1m market cap—and allocate some tokens directly to the team.

Why does this matter? In meme coin ecosystems, especially on platforms like Solana's pump.fun, tokens often start with a bonding curve. This is essentially a pricing mechanism where the token's value increases automatically as more people buy in, creating a smooth liquidity ramp-up. But without team intervention, early developers or automated snipers can jump in first, scoop up cheap tokens, and flip them for quick gains—essentially getting "free money" without contributing to the project's long-term success.

Baoskee's tweet highlights a practical approach to level the playing field: "i guess if you're going to launch an official coin as a strong team it makes sense to bundle or the alternative is start out with a bonding curve at $500k or $1m instead and grab some for the team else the early dev bundlers get free money for no reason." You can check out the full tweet here.

Community Reactions and Examples

The tweet quickly drew responses from the crypto community, showing how these ideas resonate in real-time discussions. One reply from @Dae_kieran shared a screenshot of token stats, illustrating holder distribution in a live example. It shows top 10 holders controlling about 20%, with minimal bundler activity at 0.01%, and full LP (liquidity pool) burned—common signs of a fairer launch setup.

Another user, @asdasxd357, dropped a meme image referencing "$usdaos," tying into unstable DAOs and perhaps poking fun at the volatility in these launches. It's a colorful drawing featuring robotic figures and coins, capturing the whimsical yet chaotic nature of meme token projects.

Other replies ranged from agreement—"Good idea" from @carnabnb—to enthusiasm like "thats right baosking!" from @bmbxxc_. There was even a shoutout to launching a DAO on daos.fun with "Real World ASSets" from @RWASSetsAgent. However, not everyone was on board; @idinii22 pushed back, noting that if it's not organic, buyers might fear team dumps, emphasizing the need for trust in any strategy.

Why This Strategy Could Change Meme Coin Launches

For blockchain practitioners diving into meme tokens, understanding these tactics is key. Bundling or starting higher on the curve helps teams retain control and fund development, but it requires transparency to avoid rug pull accusations. Platforms like daos.fun are making this easier by supporting community-driven launches.

If you're building in this space, consider how these methods align with your goals. They could prevent snipers from dominating early liquidity and ensure more equitable distribution. As the meme coin meta evolves, insights like Baoskee's keep the conversation going—helping everyone from devs to investors stay ahead.