autorenew
왜 스팟 가격이 DeFi에서 래핑된 자산의 청산을 좌우해서는 안 되는가

왜 스팟 가격이 DeFi에서 래핑된 자산의 청산을 좌우해서는 안 되는가

In the fast-paced world of decentralized finance (DeFi), opinions and best practices evolve quickly. A recent tweet from mst at Raydium highlights a key shift: the realization that spot market prices of wrapped assets shouldn't be the ultimate authority for triggering liquidations. This comes as a relief to early adopters who faced backlash for pushing this idea.

래핑된 자산과 청산 이해하기

First, let's break it down. Wrapped assets are essentially tokenized versions of other cryptocurrencies or tokens, designed to make them compatible across different blockchains or protocols. Examples include Liquid Staking Tokens (LSTs) like mSOL on Solana, which represent staked SOL while allowing liquidity, or USDe, Ethena's synthetic dollar stablecoin.

Liquidations happen in lending protocols when a borrower's collateral value drops below a certain threshold, risking the lender's funds. To prevent losses, the protocol sells off the collateral. The big question is: how do you accurately value that collateral?

Traditionally, some protocols might look at the spot price—the current trading price on decentralized exchanges (DEXes) like Raydium. But as the tweet points out, this can be problematic. Spot prices can be volatile or even manipulated in low-liquidity pools, leading to unfair or premature liquidations.

0xRooter와 Solend의 배경 이야기

The tweet gives a shoutout to operators like @0xrooter, the founder of Solend (now rebranded to Save Finance), a prominent lending protocol on Solana. Back in the day, 0xrooter and his team advocated for using more reliable metrics, such as oracle prices or the underlying redeemable value of the asset, instead of spot prices. This approach aimed to protect users from market manipulations.

However, this stance drew criticism. Critics argued it deviated from "pure" market-driven mechanisms, potentially introducing centralization risks through oracles. Despite the hate, as noted in various crypto discussions, it's now gaining traction as consensus in the community.

밈 토큰 애호가에게 왜 중요한가

At Meme Insider, we're all about meme tokens, but DeFi mechanics like this directly impact the broader ecosystem where memes thrive—especially on Solana, home to viral projects launched via Raydium. If you're trading or holding meme tokens as collateral in lending protocols, understanding liquidation triggers can mean the difference between keeping your position or facing a forced sell-off.

Imagine using an LST backed by a meme-related yield farm as collateral. A temporary dip in its spot price due to low liquidity could wipe you out, even if the underlying value is solid. Shifting away from spot prices promotes fairness and stability, making DeFi more accessible for meme creators and traders.

앞으로의 길

This evolving consensus reflects DeFi's maturation. Protocols are increasingly adopting hybrid valuation methods, combining oracles like those from Pyth Network with spot data for robustness. It's a win for risk management and user protection.

As blockchain practitioners, staying informed on these nuances helps you navigate the trenches. Whether you're building on Solana or just memeing around, remember: not all prices are created equal. Kudos to pioneers like 0xrooter for weathering the storm—it's paving the way for a more resilient crypto landscape.

추천 기사

Meteora가 하루 440만 달러 수수료로 Solana DEX 경쟁을 압도 — 이것이 DeFi에 중요한 이유

Meteora가 하루 440만 달러 수수료로 Solana DEX 경쟁을 압도 — 이것이 DeFi에 중요한 이유

Meteora AG가 하루 $4.4M 수준으로 Solana DEX 수수료 순위 최상위로 도약했습니다 > ***- Meteora가 $MET 토큰의 TGE에 대해 발표하면서 사용자 수수료 공유를 강조한 내용을 인용합니다.*** Raydium 같은 경쟁자를 제쳤습니다. $MET 토큰의 TGE가 다가오면서, 이 유동성 강자가 어떻게 수십억 달러의 수수료를 사용자에게 재분배하며 DeFi 지형을 뒤흔드는지 확인해보세요.